Pages

Saturday, February 7, 2015

the purpose of life

the purpose of life

to seek our salvation

the pursuit of salvation

to seek the beatific vision

to seek the salvation of others

+ + +

do unto others as you would have others do unto you

lead us not into temptation

Friday, February 6, 2015

bergoglio the slayer of saints

bergoglio the slayer of saints

Having slayed the pre-V2 saints, bergoglio now takes aim at the post-V2 saints...

JP2... off with his head!

Blessed P6... even before officially declaring him a "saint"... off with his head!

What am I talking about?

bergoglio's synod (on sex) took direct aim at JP2's teachings on the family...

... and bergoglio is also busy undermining P6's teaching on contraception and the sanctity of human life.

At the time of the canonization of JP2 and J23 I wrote the following...

[LINK]

***
In the name of "mercy" for the "divorced and re-married" he will un-mercifully destroy the family. He will tear the child from the mother's arms and hand him over to the state for his "development and education" -- totalitarian-communist style.

He will shatter the holy bonds of matrimony and instead place shackles of sinful pleasure on young people, so that marriage will become obsolete or reduced to a simple legal contract.

He will give his papal "blessing" to the diabolically perverted act of homosexual sex. An act that is an anti-baptism into the anti-church of the anti-christ. An act that can never bear fruit. A sterile blasphemous contraceptive act that brings the soul in union with the satanic.
***

I wrote this on April 30, 2014, more than six months before the synod in October 2014... and yet the Catholic world seemed shocked and surprised when bergoglio did just what I described.

Am I some sort of prophet? No, I simply listened to what bergoglio was saying... rather than pretending that bergoglio was not saying what he was saying... or saying that he was saying the exact opposite of what he was saying...

Herein is the danger of living in a fantasy world where bergoglio's heresies do not exist...

Now, finally, after the October 2014 synod many Catholics are raising their voices in opposition to bergoglio's plans for the upcoming October 2015 synod. But they are two few in number and they are mostly too timid in their responses.

As it stands, the bergoglian juggernaut continues to move forward on its diabolical mission -- unimpeded by the feeble resistance offered up to this point.

One who has spoken up recently is Archbishop Henryk Hoser saying, "The Church Has Betrayed Pope John Paul II."

[LINK]

... the irony of ironies is that at the canonization of JP2 (and J23) bergoglio said...

[LINK]

***
In his own service to the People of God, John Paul II was the pope of the family.  He himself once said that he wanted to be remembered as the pope of the family.  I am particularly happy to point this out as we are in the process of journeying with families towards the Synod on the family. It is surely a journey which, from his place in heaven, he guides and sustains.

May these two new saints and shepherds of God’s people intercede for the Church, so that during this two-year journey toward the Synod she may be open to the Holy Spirit in pastoral service to the family.  May both of them teach us not to be scandalized by the wounds of Christ and to enter ever more deeply into the mystery of divine mercy, which always hopes and always forgives, because it always loves.
***

... if only Archbishop Henryk Hoser had been paying attention at the time... bergoglio told us his plan... mercy, mercy and more mercy... with the intercession of JP2 -- "the pope of the family" -- of course...

As I said at the time...

***
A careful review of the [canonization] speech reveals that it contains a blueprint for [bergoglio's] plot to destroy the Church's teachings on the family with the ultimate goal of a total destruction of the family as the basis of Christian society. This is in total keeping with his humanist/freemasonic way of thinking.

The snake oil Bergoglio is using to sell this diabolical plot is "mercy". In this case "divine mercy". Yes, it is "divine mercy" but the question is what "divinity" does he worship?
***

May God have mercy on us all.

Thursday, February 5, 2015

bergoglio is NOT Catholic

bergoglio is NOT Catholic

FYI.

Here is an unedited Google translation of a reply to a letter by Alessandro Gnocchi .

I don't think any comment on my part is necessary.

[LINK to Original Italian]

[LINK to Google translation]

(H/T to Novus Ordo Watch for highlighting this via Twitter.)

+ + +

"OUT OF FASHION". Mail Alessandro Gnocchi - weekly

By Editor On February 4, 2015 · 20 Comments

... If you do not think I can say that is not Bergoglio Pope, that does not depend on the fear of making the last step of my reasoning. Are not able to say if it is not Bergoglio Pope: But I can say, and I say, that is not Catholic, in almost all of his pronouncements and his acts.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Every Tuesday Alessandro Gnocchi responds to letters from readers friends. Everyone can participate by sending their letters to info@riscossacristiana.it , with the subject: "Mail Alessandro Gnocchi". We ask our friends letters short, on topics that are of common interest, of course. Every Tuesday will choose a letter for an answer in full and, if you give short answers to other letters. It will try, where possible, to provide answers to all.

The success of this column is witnessed by the increasing number of letters arriving in the newsroom. In this regard please friends readers hold their texts within a maximum of 800-1000 jokes. This will make it easier to respond to several letters in the same week. We thank everyone for their kind attention and cooperation.

PD

.

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

.

were received in Editors:

.

Dear Dr. Gnocchi,

I am writing to ask you a simple question. I follow closely his column, which I find really useful and valuable for those who, like me, does not know where to turn to understand what is happening inside the Church. I share all of its critical current pontificate and I ask only one thing: having said all he says, and after his analysis so lucid and honest, I would say painful, I have the impression that she is still a moment before drawing final conclusions. He does it for prudence or conviction? Would not it be easier to say what it says Socci about Bergoglio?

Thank you for your attention

Lisetta Amurri

.

Dear Lisette,

certain that, as she suggests, "it would be easier to say what it says Socci about Bergoglio." But it would be wrong in the content and in the method, and I will try to explain it through a schematic reasoning maybe, but, I hope, clear.

1. What Bergoglio is demolishing even admirable energy with the Catholic Church, and I emphasize "Catholic", is in fact and not in opinions. But I disagree with those who say that he does in the name of a Third Vatican Council undeclared and that, therefore, the remedy is to apply correctly the Second Vatican. The disasters that led the Church to the brink of the precipice and many Catholics to lose faith are precisely the correct application of the Second Vatican: not of his spirit, but his letter.

2. I've said it many times and I do not tire of repeating: this Church deserves this Pope. Indeed, this Pope is the perfect expression of this Church which has less and less of a Catholic. If you come back tomorrow Benedict XVI on the chair of Peter, would not change anything, the demolition process would continue without pause, as well as held during the pontificate of Ratzinger and the conciliar and post-conciliar predecessors. That the virus had been inoculated very first is obvious, but, until Vatican II, had not manifested through magisterial documents.

I consider it an unnecessary expense of intellectual energy to mount complex, and also suggestive arguments that Pope Bergoglio not to be able to criticize. A Catholic can stigmatize, even hard, all the mistakes made in matters of faith by Pope knowing that that is the Pope. What's more, if you have ability and prestige, and to do it and it does not make a big mistake before God and before men.

I consider it a bit 'ridiculous, and very pathetic, the thought process of those who deny the facts because it would force to change the theory. You often hear argument in this way: "You can not say that this statement or behavior that the Pope is wrong because then we should say that it is not infallible." And evoke some kind of interventions arcane naming misuse the name of the Holy Spirit. But a mistake is a mistake, whoever fulfilled. And indeed, if he makes the Pope, it means that he too, and subject to certain exceptional conditions, it is not foolproof.
I do not have the ability, competence and role to say whether Bergoglio is not the Pope. I am not able to judge whether the reconstruction procedures last conclave is such as to invalidate the election. I note that none of the participants in the conclave has supported this view, at least openly. When they do I'll be happy to take into account their views. Instead, the opinion of a layman like me, as I lay in the field of theology and canon law on this issue, I rate it as my: hugging zero.

That said, if you do not think I can say that is not Bergoglio Pope, that does not depend on the fear of making the last step of my reasoning. Are not able to say if it is not Bergoglio Pope: But I can say, and I say, that is not Catholic, in almost all of his pronouncements and his acts. This is the last step of my argument and I think it is more difficult and painful than that of those who argue that it is not Bergoglio Pope. I think I can give notice of the fact that, when ritenessi of having to take another, the compirei.

I do not know why the Lord let this agony, I do not know because it makes visible that the guide of the Church give you consciously do to demolish it. I do not pretend to know the reasons, but I have the humility to accept the facts as everything that God allows, even evil, is always in view of a good that we maybe can not even imagine. Surely, a similar desolation is not a reward. We have to pay our personal sins. But I think we are paying too faults of those who came before us, particularly of those pastors who, in his time, could and should defend the flock from wolves, oppose the drift and have not done. There were ten percent do not say, but only a ten Monsignor Lefebvre instead of just one, probably we would not be reduced as well.

When I say that I have the humility to accept the facts, do not mean that we should not oppose evil, injustice and betrayal of the faith. I'm just saying that you have to fight for the good, for truth, for the salvation of our souls and for the glory of God without invent excuses that do not hold up to the test of facts. We would be defeated at the start.

Alessandro Gnocchi

Praised be Jesus Christ

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

bergoglio the atheist

bergoglio the atheist

A twelve year old girl in the Philippines asked bergoglio, "Why do children suffer?"... and then broke down in tears...

bergoglio responded that "there is no answer"... and then gave her a hug...

... he might as well have answered "because there is no God"...

... by saying "there is no answer" he was saying to this little girl... "there is no God"... this is the answer that Nietzsche would have given... "there is no answer... because there is no God..."

The girls question when properly understood is a question about the existence of God...

... the answer she hears from the world all around her is that God is a lie... where is your God... why doesn't he help the children... you see little girl that  you have been lied to... God does not exist... and if He does exist then he must be a cruel God...

... and bergoglio affirmed this by saying "there is no answer"...

And yet... and yet...

... there was no uprise of popular indignation and protest... on the contrary there was great praise for bergoglio... did you see... he gave the little girl a hug... what a kind and compassionate man he is...

... have we fallen so far... yes, this is the measure of how far we have fallen as a Catholic people... when we do not recognize when our own faith is being trampled upon...

... we should recoil in shock as if someone had trampled upon a Crucifix... instead we oooh and aaah... even as our faith is insulted...

... yes we recognize the insult when it comes to personal matters such as how many children we should have ("rabbit-gate") or insulting depictions of women in a Vatican promo video... matters which are as much (or more) about our humanistic views of "freedom" as they are about anything having to do with our Catholic faith...

+ + +

For a much more complete and thorough response to this overlooked example of bergoglio's false compassion please see the following Novus Ordo Watch article (yes, they are sedevacantist -- so what?)...

[LINK]

Here is a quote from the article which sums up the very serious nature of bergoglio's empty response...

"What surer way is there to make people lose Faith in God — or begin to have an aversion for Him and get angry at Him — than to say that there is no answer to the problem of suffering, especially the suffering of children and innocent people?"

+ + +

May God have mercy on us all.

bergoglio is a poser

bergoglio is a poser

Think about it...

Most men hate to get their picture taken...

All of that posing... and smiling... and making sad faces... and cameras and flashes in your face...

... but bergoglio -- mr. humble -- loves the attention... and being in the spotlight... and his adoring "fans"...

YES! FANS!

You would think he is some sort of rock-star rich-and-famous "celebrity"...

YES! CELEBRITY!

Of the "humble" variety of course...

~~~

Hey bergoglio! Over here! Can I take a picture with you?

ber-gog-li-o... we love you-o...

Can we take a selfie?

1... 2... 3... ok... smile... say "humble"...

~~~

What kind of men like to pose and constantly have their pictures taken...

... let me think...

... "humble" ones... no-o-o...

... effeminate ones... hmm-m-m-m...

Monday, February 2, 2015

bergoglio joke of the day

bergoglio joke of the day

Queers: where bergoglio knows your name.

~~~
~~~

That's it?

I don't know what else to say...

How about, "hey bergoglio, get out of the Vatican and take your pervert freak show with you!"

Is that supposed to be funny?

Sort of... about as funny as "Queers: where bergoglio knows your name"

It's a take off on Cheers: where everybody...

... I got that...

I was thinking of making bergoglio the bartender... but I ran out of ideas...

You could make him the bouncer at the bar...

Yeah... I thought of that too...

And his homilies sound like something a couple of drunks would say at a  bar...

Yeah... I thought of that too...

You could make him a bartender/bouncer at a gay bar...

Yeah... I thought of that too...

That would be funny...

Yeah... if only bergoglio wasn't the pope... that's the part that's not so funny...

... that's true... a funny pope isn't really funny...

... sad really when you think about it...

... better just stick to "Queers: where bergoglio knows your name"

... Yeah... that's what I thought too...

Mercy Mercy Me (Catholic Theology)

Mercy Mercy Me (Catholic Theology)

Here is a preview of something I have been working on. It is based on a song by Marvin Gaye titled "Mercy Mercy Me (the ecology)" which I have re-named "Mercy Mercy Me (Catholic Theology)".

And of course the inspiration comes from the upcoming enviro-cyclical by bergoglio.

I have recorded a rough version and one of these days perhaps I'll record a finished version and post it on my YouTube channel.

In case you don't know, Marvin Gaye was a very popular (Motown) singer who was tortured by demons -- as many/most/all in the entertainment industry are. He was eventually shot to death by his own father.

The original song has a very dissonant, demonic sounding ending. I would not recommend listening to it. The vocals are overdubbed to form a chorus of "spiritual" sounds -- a new age anthem dedicated to the "spirit of this world"...

... the same "spirit" that inspires bergoglio...

---

Mercy Mercy Me (Catholic Theology)
(c) 2015 Michael at Public Vigil
 
Woo ah, Kyrie eleison
Ah, things aren't what they used to be, no no
Where did all the good popes go?
Heresy is in the wind that blows
From the north and south and east

Woo, Cristo eleison
Ah, things aren't what they used to be, no no
Altars desecrated by heterodox priests (in all our diocese)
Sermons full of blasphemy

Ah, oh Kyrie eleison
Ah, things aren't what they used to be, no no
The spirit of Vatican II is in our parishes
And the souls of faithful Catholics are perishing

Oh mercy, mercy me
Ah things aren't what they used to be
What about the Church of God
How much more abuse from man can she stand?

Ora pro nobis,
My sweet Virgin Maria, ora pro nobis
Maria, o dulcis Virgin Maria...