Pages

Monday, October 7, 2013

Video of Pope Francis praying before St. Francis Crucifix (50 seconds)

[27] And after the morsel, Satan entered into him. And Jesus said to him: That which thou dost, do quickly. [28] Now no man at the table knew to what purpose he said this unto him. [29] For some thought, because Judas had the purse, that Jesus had said to him: Buy those things which we have need of for the festival day: or that he should give something to the poor.
 -- Gospel According to Saint John 13:27-29



About a year ago I wrote the following in this blog:

The other day I was struck by some words from Pope Benedict about Judas. Perhaps I am reading too much into his words, but he seemed to have a message for those who dissent from Church teaching. Here are his words which are a reflection on the reaction of many of his disciples to Christ's teaching that He is the Bread of Life from John Chapter 6...
In the end, Jesus knew that even among the Twelve there was one who did not believe: Judas. Judas too could have left like the other disciples did; perhaps he should have left had he wanted to be honest. Instead he stayed with Jesus. He stayed not because of faith, not because of love, but with the secret plan to get back at the Master. Why? Because Judas felt that Jesus had betrayed him and he decided to betray Jesus in turn. Judas was a zealot and wanted a victorious Messiah who would lead a revolt against the Romans. Jesus frustrated these expectations. The problem is that Judas did not leave and his gravest fault was falsity, which is the sign of the devil. Because of this Jesus said to the Twelve: “One among you is a devil!” (John 6:70). Let us pray to the Virgin Mary, who helps us to believe in Jesus, as St. Peter did, to be ever more sincere with him and with everyone.
Is the Pope asking the dissenters to leave the Church? Could he possibly be comparing their acts of treason with the betrayal of Jesus Christ?



NOTE: Notice how this video report from CatholicTV skips over the more important words of Pope Benedict and in so doing does not convey the Pope's message at all. Instead CTV communicates a secular humanist feel-good message. This is par for the course for the official Vatican news services. Vatican Radio and the rest are more interested in portraying the Church as an NGO that is in line with the mundane goals of secular humanism rather than the Church of Jesus Christ with a divine mission to save souls.

Sunday, October 6, 2013

When the pope is wrong

Now faith is the substance of things to be hoped for, the evidence of things that appear not.
 -- Epistle Of Saint Paul To The Hebrews 11:1
"When the pope is wrong" is the title of a talk by Dr. William Marra. I have provided excerpts from it in the following video:



I want to make it clear that this talk was given during the pontificate of John Paul II (I don't know the year.) So nothing in this video is specifically relevant to the current pope.

However, there is a growing chorus of voices that are highlighting errors by the pope in recent interviews. It is therefore interesting to hear what Dr. Marra has to say about different scenarios in which the pope can be wrong.

Please note that I am providing limited excerpts from the speech, however I have not provided the full speech because it is not freely available. You can download it for $1.50 at:
http://www.keepthefaith.org/detail.aspx?ID=151

Keep the Faith is an excellent Catholic site with many informative talks by Dr. Marra and others. I just wish that they would make these freely available so that more people could access them.

I also want to say how much this situation saddens me. I will continue praying for the pope and I ask that you do the same.

The icon that appears in the video depicts the death of the Blessed Virgin and her assumption into heaven. What sadder time was there for the Church than this?

 + Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us.

Friday, October 4, 2013

Who is my father?

[32] Every one therefore that shall confess me before men, I will also confess him before my Father who is in heaven. [33] But he that shall deny me before men, I will also deny him before my Father who is in heaven. [34] Do not think that I came to send peace upon earth: I came not to send peace, but the sword. [35] For I came to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

[36] And a man' s enemies shall be they of his own household. [37] He that loveth father or mother more than me, is not worthy of me; and he that loveth son or daughter more than me, is not worthy of me. [38] And he that taketh not up his cross, and followeth me, is not worthy of me.


 -- Gospel According to Saint Matthew10:32-38
Who is my father? Who is my mother?

Ultimately my Father is God and my Mother is Mary.

The pope is a father -- papa. But should we love papa more than God? No!

The Church is my mother. But should I love the Church more than Mary? No!

If the pope or the Church denies that Jesus Christ is truly the Son of God then the choice is clear. And it is time of war and of the sword -- man against father and daughter against mother.

Pope Francis said recently:
“The Son of God became incarnate in the souls of men to instill the feeling of brotherhood. All are brothers and all children of God. Abba, as he called the Father. I will show you the way, he said. Follow me and you will find the Father and you will all be his children and he will take delight in you. Agape, the love of each one of us for the other, from the closest to the furthest, is in fact the only way that Jesus has given us to find the way of salvation and of the Beatitudes.”
To which Louie Verrecchio responded:
Don’t let the mere invocation of Our Lord’s blessed name fool you. The cold hard reality is simply this: The 266th Successor to the Throne of St. Peter is actively preaching a god who is not Jesus Christ, King of kings and Lord of Lords.

In this one concise statement, Pope Francis has delivered the credo by which he intends to complete the work of supplanting the Church of Jesus Christ with the church of man. Ignore it at your own peril.
The Holy Spirit is at work here revealing to us the true beliefs of the current occupant of the Seat of Peter. When he says "the Son of God", what does he mean? When he recites the Apostle's Creed, does he believe it without reservations?

Verrechio continues:
To be more specific, by beginning this preposterous statement with, “The Son of God,” foolish Christians will let their guard down and either accept, or perhaps simply dismiss, what follows, but it is precisely this that deserves intense scrutiny.

Everyone reading this understands well that the Incarnation of Our Blessed Lord has nothing whatsoever do with “feelings of brotherhood.” If that were its purpose, Baptism would be of no use, nor would any need exist for conversion to the one true faith that Jesus established.
As unfathomable as it may seem, this pope does not believe in the Trinity. He does not believe that Jesus Christ is truly the Son of God incarnate of the Virgin Mary!!!

To him Christ is a prophet, a good and wise man. This is what the Muslims believe and even  some Jews. But he does not believe that Christ is the Messiah. No wonder that he can be on such good terms with his Jewish friends and why he seems to be so close to the Muslims.

When Bergoglio says Christ is the son of god, does he capitalize it in his mind? No, I don't think so. In his mind we are all the sons of god, so of course it is not a contradiction for him to call Jesus the son of god while not believing in the Trinity.

His god is the god of freemasonry. He is a deist and a secular humanist.

This is worse, much worse than anything he has said previously. It is utter blasphemy.

No wonder that our secular humanist president, Barack Obama, is "hugely impressed" with pope Francis.


 + + +

Today is the feast day of St. Francis. Please say a Rosary for the pope and ask Our Lady to intercede and convert the heart of Jorge Bergoglio and all those who have fallen into similar errors of the faith.

 + St. Francis of Assisi, pray for us.
 + Our Lady of Mt. Carmel, pray for us.

Wednesday, October 2, 2013

The Chastisement

[7] For the earth that drinketh in the rain which cometh often upon it, and bringeth forth herbs meet for them by whom it is tilled, receiveth blessing from God. [8] But that which bringeth forth thorns and briers, is reprobate, and very near unto a curse, whose end is to be burnt. [9] But, my dearly beloved, we trust better things of you, and nearer to salvation; though we speak thus. [10] For God is not unjust, that he should forget your work, and the love which you have shewn in his name, you who have ministered, and do minister to the saints.
 -- Epistle Of Saint Paul To The Hebrews 6:7-10
Allow me, my dear brothers and sisters in Christ, to share with you a private revelation -- a gift of the Holy Spirit.

Let me reveal to you what the Holy Spirit has revealed to me regarding this passage from the Epistle Of Saint Paul To The Hebrews 6:13-20.
[13] For God making promise to Abraham, because he had no one greater by whom he might swear, swore by himself, [14] Saying: Unless blessing I shall bless thee, and multiplying I shall multiply thee. [15] And so patiently enduring he obtained the promise.

[16] For men swear by one greater than themselves: and an oath for confirmation is the end of all their controversy. [17] Wherein God, meaning more abundantly to shew to the heirs of the promise the immutability of his counsel, interposed an oath: [18] That by two immutable things, in which it is impossible for God to lie, we may have the strongest comfort, who have fled for refuge to hold fast the hope set before us. [19] Which we have as an anchor of the soul, sure and firm, and which entereth in even within the veil; [20] Where the forerunner Jesus is entered for us, made a high priest for ever according to the order of Melchisedech.
The key words which the Holy Spirit highlighted for me were "immutability" and "immutable". Unchanging and unchangeable -- eternal.

The passage speaks of eternal truths. But which truths? Were these truths that only applied to the people of the Old Covenant?

God made a covenant with Abraham -- a promise. God swore an oath on himself because there is nothing higher upon which He can swear.

What the Holy Spirit revealed to me is that a similar oath applies to the people of the New Covenant -- we who are Christians; we who are Catholics.

The triune God swore, "Tu es Petrus et super hanc petram aedificabo ecclesiam meam et portae inferi non praevalebunt adversus eam. [Thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. Mt 16:18]."

And as the Apostle tells us "it is impossible for God to lie". Therefore, "we may have the strongest comfort".

"We have as an anchor of the soul, sure and firm" Our Lord Jesus Christ. He will never abandon us. He is the "high priest" who "entereth in even within the veil" -- the holy of holies of the temple.

"For God making promise" to Peter to "multiply thee". And we have  seen how the Church grew against all odds through the power of the Holy Spirit.

Peter "patiently enduring obtained the promise". Peter was willing to sacrifice his life, just as Abraham was willing to sacrifice his only son, Isaac.

Now we must "patiently endure" this Chastisement of the Church -- this sacrifice of the Bride of Christ -- in order to "obtain the promise".

One day I pray that you  and I also will "entereth in even within the veil" and behold the face of God and be warmed by his brilliant radiance, in the company of the angels and the saints and the Blessed Virgin Mary.

St. Paul is the least appreciated of the mystics of the Church.

 + + +

The Chastisement I was referring to is the one revealed by Our Lady to Sister Lucia of Fatima. And also the children of Garabandal... [I also seem to remember a Chastisement at LaSalette and other apparitions of Our Lady.]
“Father, the Most Holy Virgin is very sad because no one has paid any attention to Her Message, neither the good nor the bad. The good continue on their way, but without giving any importance to Her Message. The bad, not seeing the punishment of God actually falling on them, continue their life of sin without even caring about the Message.  But believe me Father, God will chastise the world, and this will be in a terrible manner. The punishment from Heaven is imminent.”
This was in 1957.

In 2007 -- 50 years later -- John Vennari wrote in reference to this Chastisement warned of by the Blessed Virgin to Sister Lucia:
*****
I want to tell you what I believe is the real nature of the chastisement we are now under, and it is something that will lead to all of the other material chastisements that Our Lady warned about at Fatima.

What we have lost, and what a staggering number of Catholic churchmen have lost, is the recognition of the immutability of objective truth.

It is immutability truth — that is — unchangeable Catholic faith that informs our intellect that gives us the ability to appreciate the value of the Holy Icons of Our Lady; that gives us the ability to reverence the altars.

And I truly believe that this loss of the recognition of the immutability of objective truth is the deceiving influence of our time, and that this deceiving influence is a punishment from God.

What does Scripture warn regarding the coming of anti-Christ — and by extension, the coming of the spirit of anti-Christ as it appears in any age?

“For they have not received the love of the truth that they might be saved. Therefore God sends them a deceiving influence [the Douay-Rheims calls it ‘an operation of error’] that they may believe a falsehood.” (2 Thess. 2:10)
Thus I believe the deceiving influence of our time, the operation of error of our time, is the loss of the recognition of the immutability of objective truth.

[...]

This failure to recognize the immutability of objective truth manifests itself in the heresy of Modernism; the belief that there is some portion of Catholic dogma that changes over time; the belief that religion must change with the times; the belief that what the Church taught 100 years ago has to be retooled, or repackaged, or updated into new “Catholic” teachings of today.

It is the buzzword of Vatican II: Aggiornamento! Update!
*****
Notice the keyword: IMMUTABLITY!

Now I invite you to read the rest of John Vennari's article (actually it is a transcript of a speech) here:

Fatima and the Great Chastisement

You may also be interested in watching this video of John Vennari in response to Pope Francis' interview with the atheist editor of La Republicca:

 + + +

And then there is Louie Verrecchio at "Harvesting the Fruit of Vatican II" who asks "Is Pope Francis a modernist?"
*******
The answer, according not to me, but to Pope St. Pius X, is yes.

[...]

The smallest number of those among us, however, will look without fear at the bitter reality that papa is drunk on modernism, and his reckless behavior is so dangerous that it threatens not only those who dwell within the Household of God, but even those who wander in darkness beyond its walls.

Among them, a relative few intrepid souls will do everything in their power to warn the others, both within and without, taking bullets and arrows and all manner of artillery simply for daring to proclaim the immutable truths of the Faith that alone can assure our salvation.
*******
There is that word again: IMMUTABLE!

 + + +

Conchita of Garabandal
The Virgin said: “Because it was not fulfilled and my message from October 18th, 1961 has not been made known to the world, I tell you this is the last one. Before the cup was being filled, but now it is overflowing. Many priests are walking through the path of perdition and taking with them many souls. Less and less importance is given to the Eucharist. You should prevent God’s anger upon you with your efforts. If you ask forgiveness with sincerity, He will forgive you. I, your Mother, through the intercession of the Archangel Michael, want to tell you to amend your lives. You are in the last warning. I love you very much and don’t want your condemnation; ask and you will receive. You should do more sacrifice; think more in the passion of Jesus.”

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Bergoglio in Argentina

[31] Mockery and reproach are of the proud, and vengeance as a lion shall lie in wait for him. [32] They shall perish in a snare that are delighted with the fall of the just: and sorrow shall consume them before they die.
 -- Ecclesiasticus 27:31-32
There is no use hiding from or denying the bitter truth of the situation anymore. Francis is Bergoglio. We can only pray for the power of the Holy Spirit to convert this man.

As this video demonstrates he does not even acknowledge that the Mass is the sacrifice of Christ on Calvary and that the bread and the wine are truly the Body and Blood of Our Savior as he taught us, and has been taught and accepted by all of the Church since the very beginning; and as will be accepted by all faithful Catholics until the end of time -- no matter what anyone may say.

Where is the reverence? Where is the humility in the presence of the King of Kings?

[EDIT: This is from the official biography of Francis on the Vatican website: "Until the beginning of the recent sede vacante, he was a member of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, the Congregation for the Clergy, the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life, the Pontifical Council for the Family and the Pontifical Commission for Latin America."]

I would like to know how any believing Catholic can say that the priest in this video is worthy of occupying the Chair of Peter?



Dear God, give us the strength, the courage and the wisdom to survive these dark times. Deliver Your Church from evil.

St. Michael, pray for us.

 + + +

A Buenos Aires journalist describes Bergoglio

The Horror!

Of all the unthinkable candidates, Jorge Mario Bergoglio is perhaps the worst. Not because he openly professes doctrines against the faith and morals, but because, judging from his work as Archbishop of Buenos Aires, faith and moral seem to have been irrelevant to him.

A sworn enemy of the Traditional Mass, he has only allowed imitations of it in the hands of declared enemies of the ancient liturgy. He has persecuted every single priest who made an effort to wear a cassock, preach with firmness, or that was simply interested in Summorum Pontificum.

Famous for his inconsistency (at times, for the unintelligibility of his addresses and homilies), accustomed to the use of coarse, demagogical, and ambiguous expressions, it cannot be said that his magisterium is heterodox, but rather non-existent for how confusing it is.

His entourage in the Buenos Aires Curia, with the exception of a few clerics, has not been characterized by the virtue of their actions. Several are under grave suspicion of moral misbehavior.

He has not missed any occasion for holding acts in which he lent his Cathedral to Protestants, Muslims, Jews, and even to partisan groups in the name of an impossible and unnecessary interreligious dialogue. He is famous for his meetings with protestants in the Luna Park arena where, together with preacher of the Pontifical House, Raniero Cantalamessa, he was "blessed" by Protestant ministers, in a common act of worship in which he, in practice, accepted the validity of the "powers" of the TV-pastors.

This election is incomprehensible: he is not a polyglot, he has no Curial experience, he does not shine for his sanctity, he is loose in doctrine and liturgy, he has not fought against abortion and only very weakly against homosexual "marriage" [approved with practically no opposition from the episcopate], he has no manners to honor the Pontifical Throne. He has never fought for anything else than to remain in positions of power.

It really cannot be what Benedict wanted for the Church. And he does not seem to have any of the conditions required to continue his work.

May God help His Church. One can never dismiss, as humanly hard as it may seem, the possibility of a conversion... and, nonetheless, the future terrifies us.
[EDIT: The original Spanish language version of this article by Marcelo González is here. He has a new article (in Spanish) titled, "A Masterpiece of Ambiguity" concerning the latest La Repubblica interview. He says when he wrote the "Horror" article he was criticized for being too severe with Bergoglio, but now he is being criticized for not having been severe enough!]

 + + +

Vatican III

[1] Woe to the pastors, that destroy and tear the sheep of my pasture, saith the Lord. [2] Therefore thus saith the Lord the God of Israel to the pastors that feed my people: You have scattered my flock, and driven them away, and have not visited them: behold I will visit upon you for the evil of your doings, saith the Lord. [3] And I will gather together the remnant of my flock, out of all the lands into which I have cast them out: and I will make them return to their own fields, and they shall increase and be multiplied. [4] And I will set up pastors over them, and they shall feed them: they shall fear no more, and they shall not be dismayed: and none shall be wanting of their number, saith the Lord.
 -- Prophecy Of Jeremias 23:1-4
It keeps getting worse. Vatican III is coming.

Pope Francis to 'rip up and rewrite' Vatican constitution
As a group of eight Catholic cardinals handpicked by the Pope to shake up the Vatican’s murky and autocratic bureaucracy prepares to meet, the group’s leader has said they plan to rip up and rewrite the apostolic constitution which apportions power at the Holy See.
May God have mercy on our eternal souls.

Blessed Virgin Mary,
Queen of Heaven,
Mother of God...
Pray for us

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

A Vatican II Pope

[1] Dearly beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits if they be of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. [2] By this is the spirit of God known. Every spirit which confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh, is of God: [3] And every spirit that dissolveth Jesus, is not of God: and this is Antichrist, of whom you have heard that he cometh, and he is now already in the world. [4] You are of God, little children, and have overcome him. Because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.

[5] They are of the world: therefore of the world they speak, and the world heareth them. [6] We are of God. He that knoweth God, heareth us. He that is not of God, heareth us not. By this we know the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.

 -- 1 John 4:1-6
"A Vatican II Pope" is the title of the editorial in America magazine introducing the pope's interview. In case you don't know America is a magazine of the Jesuits. It is nearly incomprehensible to me that the Jesuits have become the most liberal of all the major religious orders in the Church.

St. Ignatius of Loyola, pray for us.

In the days after the resignation of Ratzinger and before the election of Bergoglio I wrote...
Our last two popes both participated actively in the council and tried to steer the interpretation of the  council afterwards. What will be the relationship of the next pope to the council?

This will be one of the key questions that the next pope will need to answer early on in his papacy. And he will need to continually re-address this issue throughout his papacy, just as Benedict had to.
Well, Pope Francis has certainly "continually re-addressed" Vatican II since the very moment of his election.

The America magazine editorial says:
"[Francis] has been putting [the council’s basic message] into action by word and deed ever since his election."
In other words the documents of Vatican II are not important. What is important is "the council’s basic message" which is "the spirit of Vatican II".

Pope Benedict said:
"The hermeneutic of discontinuity risks ending in a split between the pre-conciliar Church and the post-conciliar Church. It asserts that the texts of the Council as such do not yet express the true spirit of the Council. It claims that they are the result of compromises in which, to reach unanimity, it was found necessary to keep and reconfirm many old things that are now pointless. However, the true spirit of the Council is not to be found in these compromises but instead in the impulses toward the new that are contained in the texts."
Pope Francis said:
"The council was a beautiful work of the Holy Spirit, but after 50 years, have we done everything the Holy Spirit in the council told us to do?" .... "There are voices saying we should go back. This is called being hard-headed, this is called wanting to domesticate the Holy Spirit, this is called becoming 'foolish and slow of heart.'"
I have my doubts as to the nature of the "spirit" of Vatican II. I'm convinced that it has very little if anything to do with the Holy Spirit.

Despite what others may say, Francis is driving a wedge through the Church. He is drawing a line between the pre-Vatican II and post-Vatican II Church.

If I have to choose, then there is no doubt that I choose the Church of Jesus Christ and the Apostles and the Fathers of the Church and the Saints and the Angels and the Blessed Virgin Mary.

Pray for the Pope and the Holy Catholic Church.

 + + +

Related blog articles: