bergoglio and Vatican agree that they can't agree on anything

bergoglio and Vatican agree that they can't agree on anything

Vatican says regarding the "sign of peace" in the Novus Ordo Mass:

"During the Synod of Bishops there was discussion about the appropriateness of greater restraint in this gesture, which can be exaggerated and cause a certain distraction in the assembly just before the reception of Communion."

Meanwhile here is super-bergoglio in action:

"At the papal Mass in Bethlehem last 25 May, the  Muslim Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas was curiously nearby at the sign of peace with the Pope on the altar  to visibly exchange an embrace."

See picture here.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEicoNWDaa2oiKLcU2DojrOYUzOZpd8jkVuI_6sTr5b4WWAVOWz7sC_yZfDugoLVcqsexJbDL3qXBV0bwUPpmeBPeI5jLEhTaZxrl_n5QwF0SoIIlBMrynh9QHdsh3mjhwXfPRr1_KHWn2CR/s1600/Pala%CC%88stinenserpra%CC%88sident-Mahmoud-Abbas-bei-Papstmesse.jpg

Read more at Eponymous Flower -- "Sign of Peace Yes, But Without Confusion --- Pope Francis Corrects an Abuse"

http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2014/08/sign-of-peace-yes-but-without-confusion.html

BTW, I have a problem with the title of that article. The problem is that it just isn't true. Can you spot the error?